Tag Archives: 2

Happy Second Anniversary TEA Party in the United States of America

Two years and one week ago:

Two years ago:

A Tea Party protester holds a sign saying “Remember: Dissent is Patriotic” at a Nashville Tea Party on February 27, 2009.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tea_Party_movementCachedSimilar

TEA Parties are still standing tall against the Yellow Journalists aka in the tank MSM, the Ridiculous Administration, the Union Goons, the False Organizational Thugs and the Socialist Minions.

When TEA Parties are in the right, everything else is nothing but LEFT overs~

TEA Party On!

:)

Pathetic! Moveon.org in Little Rock! Right to Work State… Hello Stupid… Organization 101

So in all of Arkansas, there was no support for the AFL-CIO when they tried their utmost to agitate in Little Rock, at the State Capitol, this past Tuesday. Then Moveon.org piggybacks as it tried to move on into Little Rock again, today, for the ever manipulative and radicalized Rally to Save the American Dream and well…

…it was another lackluster turnout and sour attempt to push the Administration’s Union agenda. Hello…  moronic Moveon.orgArkansasRight to Work State! Unionized Teachers you should know better!

Union Slugs Trudging at Little Rock Capitol Building 2.26.11

Rally to Save the American Dream staged event in Little Rock Arkansas for moveon.org goons turns into a “preaching to the choir” event with Union Teachers trudging along. Lame… Lame… Lame turnout for a ‘National Event’. And evidently no pride in appearances… bwa ha ha.

10 Minutes Before High Goon! Unorganized Radically!

Any Questions of Teacher Unions Hand in Hand With Radicals?

One Again Hail, Hail the GANGS are Here! No Support in Arkansas! Hello... Patriots Live Here!

One again, such a disgraceful turnout and that is because there were any organizational and union thugs (Moveon.org & AEA) to show up on such a fine Saturday!

But AEA & Moveon.org do you want to see a real turnout with a genuine Patriotic cause?

TEA Party Fill Steps, Grounds all the Way Around the Capitol Bldg

Unions and Thug Organizations are so last century!

Jonathan Narcisse Has Time To Trash And What About That Cash? IOWA HUGE RED FLAG!

WARNING – LOW to NO INTEGRITY!

HUGE RED FLAG!

Clever Boys… listen to the first few minutes of the exchange between the radio personality and Jonathan Narcisse… not only do they both submit false accusations upon this blogger down here in Arkansas, they also validate that lies are acceptable, condoned… and research is an afterthought! Classic Alinsky! Download this show

All provided by station 98.3 WOW-FM on October 25, 2010 Bradshaw – Oct 21, 2010 HOUR 3. I reached out and contacted the radio station and Mr. Jonathan Narcisse yesterday for a response… Crickets…  as of 11:00 a.m. CST today!

By the way, what are the following donations/contributions paying for? The current list of fools, and their money that was quickly parted, is provided here:

https://webapp.iecdb.iowa.gov/PublicView/statewide/2010/Period_Due_Date_19-Oct/Candidates/Narcisse%2C%20Jonathan_Narcisse%20for%20Iowa_5144/Narcisse%2C%20Jonathan_Narcisse%20for%20Iowa_5144_A_Contributions.pdf

IOWA don’t be tooled! He’s only working it for 2% to create another party for his own benefit on Iowans’ backs! He never had a chance of obtaining the Governorship. So why would he run?

1 Tool + 1 Run = 1 Party upon 2% Attained & CONTROL!

Governor Candidates Debate on Iowa Public Television, Radio Why didn’t Narcisse show? From the article

“…Conspicuously absent from the debate was Jonathan Narcisse, a newspaper publisher and former Des Moines school board member. While the other candidates have as stated goals to win ballot access or to build their ideological movements, Narcisse has insisted from the beginning that he is going to win the election and may have found it below him to appear. Ironically, Narcisse has been very vocal about his exclusion from the debates between the major party candidates…”

Remember These Reports

Why Does Jonathan Narcisse Still Have Any Supporters? Have You Read His Records?
Iowa Alert – Jonathan Narcisse’s Phantom Threats vs Well… You Be the Judge
Jonathan R. Narcisse Received a Letter of Reprimand – Another Red Flag
Jonathan Narcisse And a Tale of Woe… and Whoa… Look at This!
Jonathan Narcisse Building a Party for Himself or Iowa?
Does Jonathan Narcisse Support Socialist, Democratic, Union or Liberal Agendas?
Iowa – Email Privacy Issues Follow Jonathan Narcisse Wherever He Goes
Jonathan Narcisse Has a Temper Tantrum and Pulls Out The Race Card on This Conservative Blogger
Mr. Jonathan Narcisse – INO (Independent in Name Only) ALERT to IOWA Voter

LTC Terry Lakin Has An Affidavit from Ret AF LT General Thomas McInerney

Sent: Tue, Aug 31, 2010 4:51 pm
Subject: Three-Star General Files Sworn Affidavit Supporting LTC Lakin’s Case. Hearing Date Set

American Patriot Foundation for Terry Lakin

American Patriot Foundation: Updates on LTC Terry Lakin’s Case

http://www.SafeguardOurConstitution.com

American Patriot Foundation, Inc.
1101 Thirtieth Street, N.W., Suite 500
Washington, D.C. 20007
http://www.safeguardourconstitution.com
PRESS RELEASE
THREE-STAR GENERAL FILES SWORN AFFIDAVIT SUPPORTING LTC LAKIN’S CASE
______________________________________

JUDGE TO RULE THURSDAY ON DEFENSE REQUEST FOR DEPOSITION OF HAWAIIAN OFFICIALS AND FOR WRITTEN DISCOVERY OF ALL OF PRESIDENT’S SCHOOL AND COLLEGE RECORDS
__________________________________

Hearing set for Sept 2 at 1100 at Fort Meade, Maryland
________________________________________
Washington, D.C., August 31, 2010. Retired Air Force Lieutenant General Thomas McInerney has supplied an affidavit in support of Army Lieutenant Colonel Terrence Lakin, who faces trial on October 13-15. The retired Air Force three-star is the highest ranking officer yet to lend public support to LTC Lakin. His affidavit acknowledges widespread concerns over the President’s Constitutional eligibility and demands the President release his birth records or the court authorize discovery.

McInerney’s sworn affidavit was filed in Court-Martial in support of Lakin’s motions for subpoenas for all of the president’s school records, and for a deposition of the custodian of Obama’s birth records in the possession of the State of Hawaii. The Judge has set a hearing in the Court Martial on these motions for this coming Thursday, September 2nd at 11:00 at Ft. Meade, Maryland. All court proceedings are open to the public. The courthouse is located within Ft. Meade at 4432 Llewellyn Avenue, which is on the corner of Llewellyn and Ernie Pyle Road. At the first intersection after the Reece Road gate, you should turn left on to Ernie Pyle Road. The courthouse is approximately 1 mile south of the intersection of Reece Road and Ernie Pyle Road.

LTC Lakin is a physician, and is in his 18th year of service in the Army. He is Board Certified in Family Medicine and Occupational and Environmental Medicine. He has been recognized for his outstanding service as a flight surgeon for year-long tours in Honduras, Bosnia and Afghanistan. He was also awarded the Bronze Star for his service in Afghanistan and recognized in 2005 as one of the Army Medical Department’s outstanding flight surgeons. In March of this year, he announced in a video posted on YouTube that he would refuse to obey orders until receiving proof of the President’s eligibility. So far, more than 225,000 people have viewed that video.
McInerney’s affidavit can be viewed at http://www.safeguardourconstitution.com.

The following are extracts:

The President of the United States, as the Commander in Chief, is the source of all military authority. The Constitution requires the President to be a natural born citizen in order to be eligible to hold office. If he is ineligible under the Constitution to serve in that office that creates a break in the chain of command of such magnitude that its significance can scarcely be imagined.

As a practical example from my background I recall commanding forces that were equipped with nuclear weapons. In my command capacity I was responsible that personnel with access to these weapons had an unwavering and absolute confidence in the unified chain of command, because such confidence was absolutely essential– vital– in the event the use of those weapons was authorized. I cannot overstate how imperative it is to train such personnel to have confidence in the unified chain of command. Today, because of the widespread and legitimate concerns that the President is constitutionally ineligible to hold office, I fear what would happen should such a crisis occur today.

In refusing to obey orders because of his doubts as to their legality, LTC Lakin has acted exactly as proper training dictates. That training mandates that he determine in his own conscience that an order is legal before obeying it…Indeed, he has publicly stated that he “invites” his own court martial, and were I the Convening Authority, I would have acceded to his wishes in that regard. But thus stepping up the bar, LTC Lakin is demonstrating the courage of his convictions and his bravery. That said, it is equally essential that he be allowed access to the evidence that will prove whether he made the correct decision.

For the foregoing reasons, it is my opinion that LTC Lakin’s request for discovery relating to the President’s birth records in Hawaii is absolutely essential to determining not merely his guilt or innocence but to reassuring all military personnel once and for all for this President whether his service as Commander in Chief is Constitutionally proper. He is the one single person in the Chain of Command that the Constitution demands proof of natural born citizenship. This determination is fundamental to our Republic, where civilian control over the military is the rule. According to our Constitution, the Commander in Chief must now, in the face of serious– and widely held– concerns that he is ineligible, either voluntarily establish his eligibility by authorizing release of his birth records or this court must authorize their discovery. The invasion of his privacy in these records is utterly trivial compared to the issues at stake here. Our military MUST have confidence their Commander in Chief lawfully holds this office and absent which confidence grievous consequences may ensue.

Lakin is represented by military counsel, and by Paul Rolf Jensen, a civilian attorney from California who has been provided to him by the American Patriot Foundation, a non-profit group incorporated in 2003 to foster appreciation and respect for the U.S. Constitution, which has established a fund for Lakin’s legal defense. Further details are available on the Foundation’s website, http://www.safeguardourconstitution.com
—end—

NOW  Where is Brig. Gen. Colleen L. McGuire?

Safeguard Our Constitution Press Release: Lakin Appeals Army’s Fitness Report

One of our generation’s few Minutemen:

American Patriot Foundation for Terry  Lakin

American Patriot Foundation: Updates on LTC Terry Lakin’s Case

American Patriot Foundation, Inc.
1101 Thirtieth Street, N.W., Suite 500
Washington, D.C. 20007
www.safeguardourconstitution.com

PRESS RELEASE

DECORATED ARMY PHYSICIAN APPEALS ARMY’S DISPARAGING FITNESS REPORT

Court Martial Process Proceeding

Washington, D.C., July 16, 2010. Army Lt. Col. Terrence Lakin, who is being court-martialled for his principled stance in refusing to obey what he feels are illegal orders because they are given by a chain of command headed by a President who may be ineligible under the United States Constitution, has today released his appeal of the Army’s version of a “fitness report” which disparages him unjustly. The “Officer Evaluation Report,” or “OER,” as it was originally drafted praised LTC Lakin as one of the top 10% of all Army medical department officers and recommended him both for promotion to full Colonel and for medical clinic command. A few days later it was redrafted and said he was unfit for continued military service. Only one event had intervened.

On March 30, 2010, the American Patriot Foundation posted on YouTube a video (which has now been viewed more than 200,000 times) of LTC Lakin stating: “I am today compelled to make the distasteful choice to invite my own court martial, in pursuit of the truth about the president’s eligibility under the Constitution to hold office.” LTC Lakin then refused to deploy to Afghanistan as he had been ordered, until the issue of the President’s eligibility has been resolved.

The revised OER failed to note Lakin’s reasons for his position and failed to indicate that all soldiers are trained that they must disobey illegal orders. Lakin has appealed the Army’s pejorative and unfair OER that now recommends he in effect be thrown out of the Army, as the Army could do even if the Court Martial proceeding were dropped. Images of the draft OER, the final OER and the appeal can be found on the website of the American Patriot Foundation, www.safeguardourconstitution.com.

The American Patriot Foundation, a non-profit group incorporated in 2003 to foster appreciation and respect for the U.S. Constitution, has received more than a thousand donations to the legal defense fund it set up for LTC Lakin.

Art. II, sec. 1 of the U. S. Constitution explicitly provides that only “natural born” citizens can serve as president and commander-in-chief. Mr. Obama’s continuing refusal to release his original 1961 birth certificate has brought Lt. Col. Lakin to the point where he feels his orders are unlawful, and thus MUST be disobeyed.

# # # # #

For further information contact: Margaret Hemenway 202-725-7659


Share/Bookmark

Governor Jan Brewer Calls Obama Out – Again

God Bless Governor Jan Brewer

Brewer to Obama: Warning Signs Are Not Enough

SecureTheBorderAZ | June 25, 2010 | 1:00

Earlier this month, Governor Jan Brewer sat in the Oval Office with President Barack Obama to discuss the critical issue of border security. The Governor personally related to the President the concerns of millions of Arizonans over the lack of security on Arizona’s southern border. During their visit, President Obama committed to present details, within two weeks of their meeting, regarding his plans to commit National Guard troops to the Arizona border and commit to spend $500 million in additional funds on border security.

Governor Brewer remains eager to receive the specific details of President Obama’s border security plans. She continues to extend an invitation to the President to visit with families living along the southwestern border and see the situation firsthand.

The Letter ~

Letter from Governor Brewer to President Barack Obama Regarding Border Security

June 23, 2010

The Honorable Barack Obama

The President of the United States

The White House

1600 Pennsylvania Avenue

Washington, DC  20500

Dear Mr. President:

Thank you for the opportunity to visit with you in person during my recent trip to Washington, D.C.  As you know, the issue of border security is foremost in the thoughts of many Arizonans and Americans alike, and I appreciated the chance to personally relate to you my concerns and outline my proposed solutions.

Mr. President, the need for action to secure Arizona’s border could not be clearer.  Recently, my office received a number of calls from constituents concerned at reports of new sign postings in interior counties of Arizona warning residents not to access federal lands due to criminal activity associated with the border.  These warnings signal to some that we have handed over portions of our border areas to illegal immigrants and drug traffickers.  This is unacceptable.  Instead of warning Americans to stay out of parts of our own country, we ought to be warning international lawbreakers that they will be detained and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.  We ought to be establishing measures to ensure that illegal traffic of any sort is kept to an absolute minimum, and that Americans are safe and secure within our own borders.

When we visited, you committed to present details, within two weeks of our meeting, regarding your plans to commit National Guard troops to the Arizona border and expend $500 million in additional funds on border security matters.  You also discussed sending members of your senior staff to Arizona to discuss your plans.  While I am pleased the 28th has been set for a meeting time and we have reviewed a copy of the Department of Homeland Security’s “Southwest Border Next Steps” Press Release, I am still awaiting details on National Guard deployments and how the proposed additional border security funding will specifically affect Arizona (and the other Border States).  As I mentioned to you on June 3rd, it is very difficult to have much of a dialogue without specific details regarding your proposals.  I strongly urge you to request your staff provide us with missing details of your proposals prior to the meeting on the 28th.

While we await the specific details of your border security plans, I wanted to take the time to reemphasize some of what I shared with you and respond further to some of what we discussed.  In essence, I have proposed a four-point Border Surge strategy, as outlined in my recent letter to Senator Charles Schumer, summarized as follows:

1.  National Guard Personnel and Aviation

I believe a significant number of troops operating with a legitimate mission set is an essential part of any strategy to secure the border.  I appreciate your commitment of 1,200 troops and the promise that Arizona would receive the largest contingent.  I am concerned, however, that more is required, such as the deployment of 6,000 personnel proposed by Senators Jon Kyl and John McCain for the entire southwestern border.

In addition, I want to make sure that these troops have legitimate missions that:

  • Support federal, state and local law enforcement—all three!
  • Serve as a blocking force to stop illegal crossing activities.
  • Employ the troops in a way that speaks loudly to all—both north and south of the border—that the U.S. is serious about this matter.

As part of your commitment, I also hope that you order a significant increase in aviation resources supporting border security operations on the ground.  After meeting and talking to various experts, I am persuaded that aviation support is critical to the effort on the ground.  Any effort will fail absent the ability to coordinate ground assets from the air, particularly given the nature of much of Arizona’s border region terrain.  I respectfully ask that you give serious consideration to my May 20, 2010 correspondence, which makes a very reasonable request for a reallocation of National Guard OH-58 helicopter assets in order to make a Border Surge effective.  Your support of this request can make a significant difference between a winning effort versus a losing effort.

2.  Border Fence

In short Mr. President, we need to complete, reinforce and then maintain the border fence.  In my April 6, 2010 letter to you I proposed inmate labor and other methods (i.e., purchasing instead of leasing equipment) as a means to bring down construction/maintenance costs.  I certainly support efficient and effective Ports of Entry where both American and Mexican border officials can allow legal traffic and crossings.  Everywhere else along the border, though, I strongly believe we must have fencing and barriers that are both substantial and monitored if the illegal crossings are to be minimized.

3.  Enforce Federal Law and Appropriately Fund the Effort

The United States must be prepared to detain, prosecute and then incarcerate convicted violators of United States laws.  The current “no consequences policy” has resulted in a border security failure.  I appreciate your general proposal to commit additional resources, but it is very difficult for me to comment without any details.  It is without doubt, though, that the current border policy will continue to fail the State of Arizona without additional resources committed to the Border Patrol, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) personnel and detention facilities; prosecution; public defense; and federal prisons.

4.  Reimburse States for the Additional Burden of Illegal Immigration

As I mentioned the very first time we met last year, I must continue the calls for Arizona to be reimbursed for expenses we are forced to carry because of our porous southern border.  Arizona and a few other states are at a terrible disadvantage in good times, and an even worse position during bad times, because of the additional costs of illegal immigration.  Just in terms of state prison costs, we estimate ongoing expenses at approximately $150 million to incarcerate criminal aliens.  While substantial on its own, this figure does not include law enforcement, prosecution and defense costs, or the enormous societal costs of the criminal behavior of those who are not even legally entitled to be here.

We are hundreds of millions of dollars short of what we should receive to relieve the disproportionate law enforcement/jail/prison, health care and education burdens we face due to our porous southern border and rampant illegal immigration.  It is simply unfair for the federal government to force Border State taxpayers to carry these burdens.

Immigration Reform

You shared with me your thoughts about the matter of immigration reform and I am grateful you listened to mine.  As I mentioned in our meeting, the phrase “comprehensive immigration reform” is code for “amnesty” to many in Arizona and elsewhere in our Nation.  Many Americans are still waiting for the reforms that were promised by the federal government in the 1980s when amnesty was granted to thousands of illegal immigrants.  Until we establish a secure border, and reestablish trust with the public that our international borders are meaningful and important, and enforcement of federal immigration law is not an idle threat, any discussion of “comprehensive reform” is premature.

Let’s first block illegal entry into the United States and enforce current law, and then other discussions, including immigration reform, might then, and only then, make sense to the public.  I am committed to a serious discussion of legitimate reform—but not any false front for amnesty—when the federal government halts the free flow of illegal immigrants and illegal drugs across the southwestern border.

Arizona’s Law

You also shared some concerns about a “patchwork” approach to policy.  This makes sense to me, but the failure of the federal government has driven frustration levels to the point that tolerating the status quo is no longer acceptable for Arizona.  From my perspective, the single most significant factor behind the passage this year of SB 1070 and HB 2162 (the follow-up bill with amendments to SB 1070) was the frustration of Arizona elected officials, and the public we serve, regarding the failure of the federal government over the years to effectively address the problem of illegal immigration.

The growing concerns over spillover violence, the increased awareness of kidnappings, the spread of drop houses in neighborhoods throughout metropolitan areas, the scourge of the drug trade and the oppressive financial burdens posed by illegal immigration—burdens even more difficult to shoulder in this economic downturn—all contributed to accelerating the public’s frustration.

I am 100% committed to fair and just enforcement of the new Arizona law.  I have made it clear that civil rights will not be compromised.  The first step has been educating and training law enforcement, as well as the public, on the details of the law—a step I have already ordered in Arizona.

Instead of any discussion about suing Arizona and not cooperating with the efforts of local Arizona law enforcement to address illegal immigration, the federal government should reassure Arizona (and other states) that securing the border and enforcing federal immigration laws are duties to which the federal government will make a renewed and sincere commitment.

When the public sees consistent evidence of federal commitment, I am convinced the demand for state actions will wane.  State and local governments have plenty to do and will be happy to stay out of border security and immigration law enforcement—along with the expenses of such work—if the federal government takes a firm and effective grip on the problem.

Conclusion

In closing, I want to assure you that I am looking to develop a solution, not have a standoff, with you and the federal government.  Illegal immigration is a serious problem and I am sincerely committed to seeing something done to curb it.  The real challenges at hand are about violent crime, huge taxpayer burdens, the rule of law and ensuring that our southern border does not become an open door for radical terrorists.  Commerce with other countries is important to me and Arizonans—I truly want a vibrant and positive relationship with Sonora, other Mexican States and the rest of the world.  Federal immigration law, however, must be honored and enforced, and our border must represent an effective means to help ensure our sovereignty and security.

I remain eager to receive the specific details of your proposals and to have the follow-up meeting with your senior staff.  It is disappointing that we are such a short time away from the meeting and Arizona and the other Border States still are awaiting the specific details of what you are proposing.  There is still time, however, to ensure the meeting next week is productive.

Finally, I want to re-extend the invitation I made to you to come to Arizona yourself, visit with families living along the southwestern border and see the situation firsthand.  My prior visits to the border and the air survey of the Cochise County region have been very important to shaping my perspectives and thinking.  Governor Richardson joined me for one trip and I believe you would also benefit from such an experience.

And when you do come, lunch is on me!

Yours in service to the great state of Arizona,

Janice K. Brewer

Governor

We have some gutsy Governors and a weak President!

Why doesn’t Obama just get it over with and scream “Allahu Akbar” at every citizen, town, city, state, heck…. just at the United States of America in one fell swoop. We get it!

We know your agenda!

Share/Bookmark