Tag Archives: cotus

Enemy Combatants or the Enemy Within?

HUGE RED FLAG!

Seriously, Who is the Real Enemy of the American People?

Is it the “Politicians Who Own Stakes in Airport Scanner Companies“?

Could it be “The 19 Senators Who Voted To Censor The Internet“?

Maybe it is the “Red Democrats File 1 – Lynn Woolsey Sponsored Communist Party Event” sitting in our U.S. Congress?

Do we have a “loose cannon” in the Secretary of State as “Clinton Told US Diplomats to Spy at UN“?

Is it an Usurper-Supporting Supreme Court of the United States, as provided via A Statement from CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret) about the U.S. Supreme Court Decision on Kerchner et al v Obama & Congress et al.

Is it the Usurper aka Barry Soetoro aka Barack Obama and his minions or his “Daddy Warbucks” aka George Soros?

Could it be the Lame Stream Media’s Yellow Journolists and Yellow Journalists?

Tip: the answer is YES to all of the above as it is the enemy within these United States of America!

Everyone is Validating the Kenyan Birth of Bogus POTUS

BREAKING NEWS! OOPS! It happened again – TWICE! (Barack Hussein Obama)

ppsimmons | November 08, 2010

BHO bows to India – and a Kenyan CEO says BHO is Kenyan!

FREEDOM FRIDAY RADIO WEBSITE
(Click the LISTEN LIVE button on Friday afternoons from 4-6 PM – Central Time – USA)
http://www.hickoryhammockbaptist.org/…

ORIGINAL ABC ARTICLE about “FELLOW KENYAN”
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpun…

WND ARTICLE featuring this video.
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE….

AMB. OGEGO SAYS BHO WAS BORN IN KENYA!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qe2bpV…

BHO’s GRANNY SAYS HE WAS BORN IN KENYA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uXb3Cr…

Even Michelle Obama, back in April, goes there…

Obama home country is Kenya

syc1959 | April 03, 2010

Michelle Obama states Obama home country is Kenya. This is from Barack Hussein Obama’s wife.
English Dictionary
Home Country
noun
Definition
1. the country in which a person was born and usually raised, regardless of the present country of residence and citizenship

Translations:
German: Heimatland
Etymology: home + country

Unlike Patrilineality (a.k.a. agnatic kinship) is a system in which one belongs to one’s father’s lineage; it generally involves the inheritance of property, names or titles through the male line as well. As in ancestral home is the place of origin of one’s extended family. It may or may not be the place where one is born. A person’s ancestral home is a rather vague concept, which can be defined by the birth place of any of his or her patriline ancestors.

But it looks like the new COTUS is ready to get fired up ~ Congress report concedes Obama eligibility unvetted ~ and seriously involved in this HUGE misstep.

Let’s work on changing that deceiver’s White House stay to the BIG HOUSE and right away!

Cleaning Out Congress to Balance the “Balance of Power” Between COTUS, SCOTUS, & POTUS

Game On, America! Election day… the Conservatives rising…

This is what has it been all about!

It is so past time to clean out and keep in check – the Loony Left, Socialists, Marxists, Progressive Liberals and Democrats otherwise now known to be utterly Un-Americans - in DC.

Hey Washington DC, do you hear us ( WE THE PEOPLE ) now?

This Bogus President claimed we are the enemy… his audacity is dope and derangement… do you see it now?

New Congress it’s Time to Get on Task

***********************************

FOLLOW the U.S. Constitution

SUPPORT our U.S. Military

REPEAL the Health Care Bill

NO Spending

RE-ACTIVATE the House Un-American Activities Committee

CHARGE Corrupt Officials with Treason & Prosecute

“We the People” will never let the destruction aimed upon these United States of America to occur again. It’s over! We are watching and will be cleansing the political horizon at every election until it’s spotless.

E pluribus unum!

Dust Off the HUAC, Time to Bring the House Un-American Activities Committee Back To Congress Now!

When did the House Un-American Activities Committee leave the realms of the U.S. Congress? According to the History Channel:

“…The House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC), a committee of the U.S. House of Representatives, investigated allegations of communist activity in the U.S. during the early years of the Cold War (1945-91). Established in 1938, the committee wielded its subpoena power as a weapon and called citizens to testify in high-profile hearings before Congress. This intimidating atmosphere often produced dramatic but questionable revelations about Communists infiltrating American institutions and subversive actions by well-known citizens. HUAC’s controversial tactics contributed to the fear, distrust and repression that existed during the anticommunist hysteria of the 1950s. By the late 1950s and early 1960s, HUAC’s influence was in decline, and in 1969 it was renamed the Committee on Internal Security. Although it ceased issuing subpoenas that year, its operations continued until 1975….”

When did the bulk of shenanigans, in recent memory within the U.S. Government, begin… Jimmy Carter.  He was the very First Worst President of the United States of America and now we are dealing with the Very Worst, the Bogus POTUSBarack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro.

If the new clean COTUS (Congress of the United States) re-activates the House Un-American Activities Committee, we will see the Loony Liberal Progressive Socialistic, Marxist, Democrats and their ilk crawl back into the crevices from which they emerged. Over the next two years, every Red-Blooded Patriotic American should continually contact their Senators and House Representatives until HUAC is a reality!

History Repeats Itself With the Modern USA Feudal System

The Feudal System explained in the most basic terms via Mountain City Elementary:

“The feudal system was a way of government based on obligations between the lord or king and vassal.

The king gave large estates to his friends and relatives. These estates known as the fief included houses, barns, tools, animals, and serfs or peasants. The king also promised to protect the vassal on the field or in the courts. In return the nobles who were granted the fiefs swore an oath of loyalty to the king. The nobles promised never to fight against the king. They also had to give the king whatever he asked for. The king may ask for men to fight a war, money, or advice. The nobles also gave the king a place to stay when he traveled.

Each of the king’s vassals was also a lord or tenant in chief with vassals of his own. Each vassal would be an overlord to those he granted fiefs while remaining a vassal of the king. The subtenants in turn subdivided the land. Sometimes there were many levels of lords who had vassals under them.

The most important promise of the vassal to the lord was the military. The vassal usually served as a knight. This service lasted about 40 to 60 days a year. If they actually had to fight in a war they usually did so for two months. If there was no war the knights did 40 days of training at the castle.

There were only a few nobles. Most people, approximately nine-tenths, were serfs who worked the land for a noble. The serf was bound to the land. If the noble sold the land the serf went with it. This was not much better than being a slave.

A peasant village had between ten to sixty families. Each family lived in a hut made out of wood or straw. The floor was covered with straw or reeds. Beds were made from a pile of dried leaves or straw. Animal skins were used as blankets. A cooking fire burned in the middle of the hut with the smoke escaping through a hole in the roof. Furnishings included a plank table, a few stools, and a chest. Each hut had its own vegetable garden.

About half the serfs time was spent working for the lord. Jobs included working in the fields, cutting wood, hauling water, spinning and weaving, repairing buildings, and waiting on the members of the lord’s family. Peasant men were even expected to fight in times of war. Besides all the work peasants had to pay taxes to their lord. This was usually given in wheat, lamb, chicken, and other animals.

There were also some freemen peasants. These people were usually in a trade. These people were not bound to the land. They paid a fixed rent to the lord. The freemen had more legal rights than the serfs and fewer duties to the lord. In actuality there was little real difference between the freemen peasants and the serfs.

By the twelfth century this system was found throughout most of Western Europe.”


Do you see it now?

Will the US Supreme Court Attempt to Circumvent the US Constitution

With linked Headlines like these:

High Court Weighs Anti-Terror Material Support Law

U.S. Supreme Court to hear terrorism case

What portion of the population of the United States of America wants the United States Supreme Court to circumvent the U.S. Constitution by plying and playing with the First Amendment thus legalizing aiding the enemy (Terrorists)?

The US Constitution clearly states:

“…Section. 3.

Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.

The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted…”

Who embraces Terrorism? hmm?

Why will it take weeks or months for the Supreme Court to make a decision? hmm?

Is it because the US Constitution clearly states:

“…Section. 4.

The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors…”

and this option is currently viable and probable as of many recent events and revelations?

***Note to the Military – Active Duty, Inactive, Reserves, Retirees What say you?

Corruption Permeates All Three Branches of US Government – Enter SCOTUS

SCOTUS – Current Justices

Current SCOTUS.jpg

Today “Supreme Court Removes Limits on Corporate, Labor Donations to Campaigns” as reported by FOX News. Well I never thought that an entity (a corporation) would be given the First Amendment to own and embrace? Are there any exceptions, any caveats? Oh if this isn’t going to be the “the one with the most spoils or soils (dollars or detractors)” can overly finance or easily smear a running candidate. Are there any time constraints, or can they love to death their next chosen one the day after any election or spew hate to cause overt distress upon a sitting official (hoping for a resignation)? Just some thoughts on how perverse this decision is to authorize corporate spending on political campaigns when…

…at the same time the other two branches of government: the Executive Branch (aka Bogus POTUS) and the Congress of the United States (COTUS) cries foul on these same corporations for paying their own employees bonuses before, during and after they bailed these same corporations out with enormous amounts of  taxpayer dollars with strings attached. Some of the worst offenders exist in our Congress who perpetuated this “Circle of Strife” recession and are still playing the game. Even Obama loves to cast a volley now and then. Oh, the irony.

Have US Government Officials Committed Treason?

Oath of Office for President of the United States:
“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”

Oath of Office for United States Senator:
I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.

Oath of Office for United States Representative of the House:
“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.”

The Legal Definition of Treason:

“…Under Article III, Section 3, of the Constitution, any person who levies war against the United States or adheres to its enemies by giving them Aid and Comfort has committed treason within the meaning of the Constitution. The term aid and comfort refers to any act that manifests a betrayal of allegiance to the United States, such as furnishing enemies with arms, troops, transportation, shelter, or classified information. If a subversive act has any tendency to weaken the power of the United States to attack or resist its enemies, aid and comfort has been given…”

The Legal Definition of Aid & Comfort:

“…To render assistance or counsel. Any act that deliberately strengthens or tends to strengthen enemies of the United States, or that weakens or tends to weaken the power of the United States to resist and attack such enemies is characterized as aid and comfort.

…”

Decide for yourself!

Once again “…If a subversive act has any tendency to weaken the power of the United States to attack or resist its enemies…”

Do you see an organized political group within the groups above that has been selling our Debt to other countries in order to weaken our economy?
Why yes you can see http://www.treas.gov/tic/mfh.txt

Do you see an organized effort through the political groups above to distribute the taxpayers’ monies to a Global Slush Fund based on Junk Science to weaken our economy?
Why yes you see http://en.cop15.dk/news/view+news?newsid=3040

Have we been warned by the country holding the highest amount of the USA’s debt to stop spending?
Why yes we have http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=119537

Has our military been disabled from proper engagement on the battle field due directly to orders under the Commander-in-Chief?
Why yes it has http://militarytimes.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1581776