I have to believe that somebody is shifting the unemployment numbers. Why has the Bureau of Labor Statistics at the United States Department of Labor, with the latest release on February 5, 2009, caused “Changes to the Employment Situation News Release on February 5, 2010“? The report, itself, is just as vacuous!
Let’s put some Truths out over liberal spin.

Google Graph provides All US unemployment rate via “Data source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics – Last updated February 3, 2010″ (?)
From the U.S. Census Bureau site:
According to the U.S. Bureau of the Census, the resident population of the United States, projected to 02/06/10 at 05:09 UTC (EST+5) is
308,627,232
COMPONENT SETTINGS FOR FEBRUARY 2010
One birth every.................................. 7 seconds
One death every.................................. 11 seconds
One international migrant (net) every............ 34 seconds
Net gain of one person every..................... 13 seconds
Courtesy of the guardian.co.uk
US food stamps set ever-higher record-32.8 million
Per CensusScope and with respect to the last 2 Census population percentage by age results:
| Age Distribution by Sex, 2000 |
|
Male |
|
Female |
|
|
Number |
Percent |
Number |
Percent |
| Total Population |
138,053,563 |
49.06% |
143,368,343 |
50.94% |
| 0-4 |
9,810,733 |
3.49% |
9,365,065 |
3.33% |
| 5-9 |
10,523,277 |
3.74% |
10,026,228 |
3.56% |
| 10-14 |
10,520,197 |
3.74% |
10,007,875 |
3.56% |
| 15-19 |
10,391,004 |
3.69% |
9,828,886 |
3.49% |
| 20-24 |
9,687,814 |
3.44% |
9,276,187 |
3.30% |
| 25-29 |
9,798,760 |
3.48% |
9,582,576 |
3.41% |
| 30-34 |
10,321,769 |
3.67% |
10,188,619 |
3.62% |
| 35-39 |
11,318,696 |
4.02% |
11,387,968 |
4.05% |
| 40-44 |
11,129,102 |
3.95% |
11,312,761 |
4.02% |
| 45-49 |
9,889,506 |
3.51% |
10,202,898 |
3.63% |
| 50-54 |
8,607,724 |
3.06% |
8,977,824 |
3.19% |
| 55-59 |
6,508,729 |
2.31% |
6,960,508 |
2.47% |
| 60-64 |
5,136,627 |
1.83% |
5,668,820 |
2.01% |
| 65-69 |
4,400,362 |
1.56% |
5,133,183 |
1.82% |
| 70-74 |
3,902,912 |
1.39% |
4,954,529 |
1.76% |
| 75-79 |
3,044,456 |
1.08% |
4,371,357 |
1.55% |
| 80-84 |
1,834,897 |
0.65% |
3,110,470 |
1.11% |
| 85+ |
1,226,998 |
0.44% |
3,012,589 |
1.07% |
| Age Distribution by Sex, 1990 |
|
Male |
|
Female |
|
|
Number |
Percent |
Number |
Percent |
| Total Population |
121,239,418 |
48.75% |
127,470,455 |
51.25% |
| 0-4 |
9,392,409 |
3.78% |
8,962,034 |
3.60% |
| 5-9 |
9,262,527 |
3.72% |
8,836,652 |
3.55% |
| 10-14 |
8,767,167 |
3.53% |
8,347,082 |
3.36% |
| 15-19 |
9,102,698 |
3.66% |
8,651,317 |
3.48% |
| 20-24 |
9,675,596 |
3.89% |
9,344,716 |
3.76% |
| 25-29 |
10,695,936 |
4.30% |
10,617,109 |
4.27% |
| 30-34 |
10,876,933 |
4.37% |
10,985,954 |
4.42% |
| 35-39 |
9,902,243 |
3.98% |
10,060,874 |
4.05% |
| 40-44 |
8,691,984 |
3.49% |
8,923,802 |
3.59% |
| 45-49 |
6,810,597 |
2.74% |
7,061,976 |
2.84% |
| 50-54 |
5,514,738 |
2.22% |
5,835,775 |
2.35% |
| 55-59 |
5,034,370 |
2.02% |
5,497,386 |
2.21% |
| 60-64 |
4,947,047 |
1.99% |
5,669,120 |
2.28% |
| 65-69 |
4,532,307 |
1.82% |
5,579,428 |
2.24% |
| 70-74 |
3,409,306 |
1.37% |
4,585,517 |
1.84% |
| 75-79 |
2,399,768 |
0.96% |
3,721,601 |
1.50% |
| 80-84 |
1,366,094 |
0.55% |
2,567,645 |
1.03% |
| 85+ |
857,698 |
0.34% |
2,222,467 |
0.89% |
Source: Census 2000 analyzed by the Social Science Data Analysis Network (SSDAN
Now if you do the math, it just doesn’t add up, but it does increase the percentage of unemployed. I wonder when the truth will come out? Or as someone emailed me today:
…Sent: Fri, Feb 5, 2010 9:24 am
THESE STATEMENTS WERE MADE IN US BUSINESS WEEK TODAY. HOW CAN THEY MATHEMATICALLY ADD UP?
The government’s survey of households showed employment increased by 541,000 workers last month and the number of people in the labor force rose. The gain brought the participation rate, or the share of the population in the labor force, up to 64.7 percent in January from 64.6 percent
Labor Department said the jobless rate slipped to 9.7 percent, FROM 10% the lowest since August.
THEN, REUTERS STATES:
“What is throwing people off is probably the 9.7 percent unemployment rate — the drop in the unemployment rate –, which is positive but is not coming from new jobs created its coming from people dropping out of the work force.
“It’s a series of conflicting data … The positive take is basically it wasn’t a total disaster, but the flip side of it is you’re not seeing a recovery.”…”