Mr. Jonathan Narcisse – INO (Independent in Name Only) ALERT to IOWA Voters!

Are you kidding me? What a slug! Is this the very best that Iowa has to offer? Jonathan Narcisse? A reformed, and I mean that in the changeling way, a Liberal Socialistic Democrat. It makes no difference how you dress one up with a new party tag, a DINO (Democrat in Name Only) who is trying to Trojan Horse the chameleon tactic of the Independent party candidate label, for ease of passing through the gate of the Governor’s mansion, shouldn’t fool anyone in Iowa or anywhere else.

Jonathan Narcisse At Campaign For Liberty Meeting

IowaWorthFightingFor | November 08, 2009

Jonathan Narcisse gives a speech to the Campaign for Liberty crowd. His Iowa Worth Fighting For speech A Ten Step Plan for Twentieth Century Governance drew several applause. People all around Iowa are aware of the need to reshape our state government and Jon’s plan is key to achieving this goal.

To the shoddy filming, to the crowd’s well established speaking voice overs and “placed on ignore” of Narcisse, to his steady reading without a teleprompter but a well stocked podium, Iowa can not possibly be impressed.

Jon Narcisse – April 8 2008 – Des Moines School Board

jneider | April 11, 2008

Des Moines School Board member Jon Narcisse discusses limits on board member use of district e-mail.

Seems they always start with breaking the small rules, make excuses, and become Progressively emboldened and move on to bigger fish.

Why is the Bleeding Heartland which describes its own blog as

Bleeding Heartland is a community blog for Democrats and progressives in the state of Iowa. Join up, post your thoughts as comments or diaries, and help build up current majorities and keep our leadership honest.

so interested in Mr. Jonathan Narcisse? hmm?

Possibly due to Mr. Narcisse himself…

The whining TOQ V3N3 for a distinct portion of the population?

Look at the CCs on a email that he replied to a Student, how embarrassing was this for the student? No privacy!

A glorified and titled Community Organizer? FY 2004 for a distinct portion of the population?

Tipping into Alinsky attack tactics? Narcisse Weekly Report, an ample example:

“…My question, Dr. Sebring, was about socio-economic status and circumstance. Regarding only two categories of socio-economic status I am confused. When I look at our socio-economic data I see categories like race and English Language Learners. Also by circumstance I find we maintain special education data.

Now if I am wrong about race, for example, being a socio-economic category, can you expand the provided information to include breakdowns by race, special education enrollment and English Language Learner status?

As for spending at the building level it will help to have a breakdown both by what is directly spent at the classroom level and what is spent directly at the building level. What I don’t want to see in this circumstance are District costs stretched out over our many schools. For the sake of insight I would like to know how much of spending takes place at the site level and how much at the District level.

Also, having this information will either confirm or dispel a wide spread perception out there. Lacking the resources of my opponents to do mass mailings and purchase lots of advertising, I had to rely on a very grassroots, groundpounding approach to getting elected. This involved going to schools, senior centers, churches and knocking on countless doors. I even stopped people in public settings like at the grocery store and asked them their opinions. This approach, I believe, contributed to me having a very diverse geographic base of support as broken down in the Register’s analysis following the election.

There is a split in this town Dr. Sebring. It is deep and heart felt. It is perceived one side of town gets their students taken care of and the rest don’t. I am not accepting this portrayal as fact. Instead I would like to examine the hard data and then, and only then, form my opinion. This seems the responsible approach to addressing such a widespread concern as articulated to me both in 2005 and 2007…”

Apparently he doesn’t like to be questioned, searched or assist with any routine police investigations PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORALVILLE, JOHNSON

Where have I seen this before? hmm?

Oh but it gets even better Jonathan Narcisse Is A Loser Who Doesn’t Pay His Bills

I guess it worked well enough for the President he supported, so he assumes that it works as handily for Iowa’s gubernatorial candidate!

Advertisements

7 responses to “Mr. Jonathan Narcisse – INO (Independent in Name Only) ALERT to IOWA Voters!

  1. I would challenge you or any of your readers to call me directly. Your commentary is ill-informed and irresponsible. I’m extending to you the opportunity to actually get the record straight.

    I am not hiding behind a screen name but right out front. I hope you have the courage to show yourself, stop assuming and get the facts.

    My number is 515-770-1218. I don’t expect to hear from you but if I do I look forward to setting the record straight.

    • I’m very transparent, everyone online knows who I am. I have your words, I have your videos & I have all links. How can you dispute what you have said and the facts from your own mouth and writings? There is nothing to discuss. Bye, bye in November 2010!

  2. Pingback: Tweets that mention Mr. Jonathan Narcisse – INO (Independent in Name Only) ALERT to IOWA Voters! « Bobbi85710's Mouth in the South -- Topsy.com

  3. Well, if you are determined to misrepresent me that is your choice. You’re like the little boy who got into trouble and when his father prepared to discipline him his response was “dad, the Bible says spare the rod and spoil the child.”

    When I got into this contest I had three objectives:

    1. Advance an agenda – AnIowaWorthFightingFor.com

    2. Engage Iowans in solution oriented discourse

    3. Develop a statewide impact mechanism

    All three of those objectives will be accomplished so I’ll be around long past November – win or lose. Beyond that you simply don’t know what you’re talking about and aren’t interested in the truth.

    Shame on you.

  4. There is no misrepresentation. Facts are facts!

    First you are wrong on my age, second, my gender, then my revelation. You have an axe to grind and an agenda to fulfill and it has nothing to do with the entire populace of Iowa.

    hmm? Building a name on the backs of a portion of the populace “…Should Narcisse win 2 percent of the vote this fall, the Iowa Party becomes a full-fledged political party in Iowa with caucuses and a primary in 2012…” or how about your very own piece “New Agenda For Black America?”

    You are not my father, husband or any other relative so keep your admonishments to yourself. You have my full and undivided attention, I am sure the citizens of Iowa would appreciate more of my insight.

  5. The sheet comes off. Thank you.

    • Once again, you Jonathan Narcisse, confirm via standard Alinsky tactics, that you are not worthy of any support from the good citizens of Iowa to gain any political position in that state. You attempt to denigrate anyone who would enlighten the people with a full and transparent vetting background check. You continually resort to baiting, that game is over, it’s a non-playable card. One would think that you had a better use of your time than to read blogs on the internet. You know your own failings, but do the good people of Iowa? Monday’s article should prove to be an awakening of the highest magnitude. You have no defense but you are offensive. You should really brush up on your Alinsky or put it away altogether, Conservatives have no use for radical tools. And a good morning to you too!

Leave a Reply to Tweets that mention Mr. Jonathan Narcisse – INO (Independent in Name Only) ALERT to IOWA Voters! « Bobbi85710's Mouth in the South -- Topsy.com Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s