What Does the Use of the Obama Autopen Prove?

That he has finally been neutered, now let the Congressional Hearings begin…

Does the use of the Obama autopen signature on a bill make a law legitimate? No! and here’s why:

Obama is not a legitimate or vetted President.

Obama, as an Usurper, with or without an autopen device never physically signed the bill into law as is required by this provision of the U.S. Constitution.

Questions to mull over:

Why was a special courier used to personally pick up his fraudulent second birth certificate from Hawaii that he “..stupidly..” placed on the White House web site?

Was there no printer, fax machine, computer to print off a copy of the bill on Air Force One, in London, in the Palace, a Kinko’s, or UPS store anywhere in Great Britain, that Obama could have actually signed? hmm?

How many ways has this Usurper found ways to circumvent our U.S. Constitution and all of the laws of the United States of America? He could never have read the bill prior to its expiration at midnight. Knowing full well he was already 5 hours into the next day/date overseas his personal signature would have missed the deadline… hmm?

There is treason afoot and a traitor in the White House.

Advertisements

One response to “What Does the Use of the Obama Autopen Prove?

  1. What does it Prove?..That obongo will do whatever he wants to, silence from the repubs, and the tea party….and the tea party wants you to support fraud cain..

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s